Balancing Our Priorities

Click here for the May 2, 2008 Conference materials

Balancing Our Priorities: 
Can We Safely Spend Less on Corrections?

a conference on the issues
Held on May 2, 2008 at the Lansing Community College

State budget shortfalls have left many state services shortchanged. The Michigan Foster Care Review Board recently reported that the system responsible for 19,000 abused or neglected children lacks the case workers and resources to properly place, protect and plan for these vulnerable wards. In 2008, eligibility criteria for the Family Independence Program were tightened to save $65 million and $18 million was cut from recipient allowances for day care. A $20 million reduction in General Fund spending for Community Health meant cuts to pregnancy prevention programs and hearing tests. Although students have shouldered repeated increases in tuition, higher education received an effective increase of only 1%. While the number of police on the street has declined by 1,600, revenue sharing payments to local communities were frozen. The Department of Environmental Quality, which protects our air, water and land resources, was cut 17%.

One department continued to see substantial growth. Corrections, with an increase of 6.4%, will spend nearly $2.1 billion – more than 20% of all of General Fund spending. With 50,000 people in prison, Michigan’s incarceration rate far exceeds those of comparable states. We rank first in the nation in the proportion of total state expenditures on corrections. It is one of the few areas where significant savings might be possible.

So we ask ourselves: How can corrections spending be safely reduced? Do we have too many people in prison or does public safety require such a large system? Should sentencing rules be adjusted to lock fewer people up? Should more people who are eligible for parole be released? What can be done about the thousands of mentally ill people who end up in prison? How cost-effective are treatment programs and crime prevention strategies? How does the return on investing in prisons compare to investing in universities, local communities and at-risk kids?

Everyone concerned about any area of state spending needs to understand the various options in corrections. To provide a basic overview to stakeholders with diverse backgrounds, five organizations with expertise in criminal justice policy will host a half-day conference, Balancing Our Priorities: Can We Safely Spend Less on Corrections? As the enclosed program indicates, speakers will represent a wide range of perspectives. All will explain how their proposals would affect corrections spending and what impact they would have on public safety. Written materials will be provided for attendees to share with their own colleagues and constituencies. 

A recent Lansing State Journal editorial noted, “2008 will likely be a significant year in setting a course for Michigan’s financial future,” and urged citizens “to start early and engage often as the debate rolls on.” If you want to participate more knowledgeably, please download and return the enclosed registration form (or register online) and join us.

Michael Marutiak
Chairperson
Prisons & Corrections Section
State Bar of Michigan

Daniel Levy
Chairperson 
Criminal Law Section     
State Bar of Michigan

Michelle Van Dusen
President
Michigan Corrections Association

Barbara Levine
Executive Director
Citizens Alliance on Prisons & Corrections

Elizabeth Arnovitz
Executive Director
Michigan Council on Crime & Delinquency


This page last revised May 13, 2008

This is a website sponsored by the Prisons and Corrections Section of the Michigan State Bar for special programs, conferences and materials.

Mailing Address:
Prisons and Corrections Section, State Bar of Michigan, P.O. Box 12037, Lansing, Michigan 48901-2037

© Copyright, Balancing Our Priorities. All Rights Reserved

[Home] [Materials]